MoSCoW Prioritization

The MoSCoW Prioritization game helps teams categorise project items into four categories: Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won't Have. This method is ideal for defining priorities, framing the scope of an MVP, and aligning stakeholders on expectations and needs. It also clarifies objectives and facilitates collective decision-making.

Walkthrough

1. 1

   Introduction to MoSCoW

   10 min

   The facilitator explains the concept of the MoSCoW method. They describe each category: 'Must Have' for essential items, 'Should Have' for important but non-critical items, 'Could Have' for desirable but non-essential items, and 'Won't Have' for what will not be included. Participants are encouraged to ask questions to ensure they fully understand each category.

   Tip — Use concrete examples to illustrate each category; this will help participants better understand the method.

2. 2

   Presentation of Items to Prioritise

   15 min

   The facilitator presents the list of items or features to prioritise. Each item is briefly described so that all participants have a clear understanding of what is at stake. Participants can ask questions to clarify the items if necessary.

   Tip — Ensure that the list of items is visible to everyone, for example on a whiteboard or shared screen.

3. 3

   Individual Ranking

   10 min

   Each participant receives cards or post-its and individually categorises each item into one of the four categories. This step allows for gathering individual opinions before moving on to group discussion.

   Tip — Encourage participants to note their reasons for the chosen ranking; this will facilitate later discussions.

4. 4

   Discussion and Consensus

   30 min

   Participants share their rankings and discuss discrepancies. The facilitator facilitates the discussion to help the group reach a consensus on each item. The goal is to ensure that everyone is aligned on the priorities.

   Tip — Be attentive to items that generate the most debate and ensure that every voice is heard.

5. 5

   Final Validation

   10 min

   The facilitator summarises the decisions made and validates with the group that everyone agrees with the final ranking. This is the time to make adjustments if necessary and to ensure that everyone is ready to move forward with these priorities.

   Tip — Use a quick vote to validate final decisions if time is limited.

Variants

• Use anonymous voting for the initial ranking to reduce group bias.
• Limit the number of items in each category to enforce strict prioritisation.
• Involve external stakeholders in the process to gain a different perspective.