Divergency Poker
Evaluate and align your team's perceptions with Divergency Poker!
Divergency Poker is a collaborative game inspired by Planning Poker, designed to help teams assess and understand differing perceptions on various topics. By encouraging discussion and exchange, this game allows participants to better understand each other and build a shared vision. It is particularly useful for identifying points of disagreement and areas for improvement in team communication.
Walkthrough
- 1
Introduction and Objectives
10 minThe facilitator introduces the game by explaining its purpose: to explore and evaluate individual perceptions on a given topic. They clarify that the game is inspired by Planning Poker and aims to foster mutual understanding. Participants are encouraged to be open and honest in their evaluations.
Tip — Use a concrete example to illustrate how different perceptions can lead to different outcomes.
- 2
Preparation of the Topic
10 minThe facilitator asks the group to choose a topic or question to evaluate. This could be an ongoing project, a decision to be made, or an aspect of team dynamics. Once the topic is chosen, it is written down visibly for all participants.
Tip — Choose a topic that sparks common interest and is relevant to the group, as this will facilitate engagement.
- 3
Distribution of Cards
5 minEach participant receives a set of numbered cards, representing different values of perception or agreement (for example, from 1 to 5). The facilitator explains that these cards will be used to express their perception of the chosen topic.
Tip — Ensure that each participant understands the meaning of the card values before starting.
- 4
Individual Evaluation
10 minParticipants reflect individually on their perception of the topic and choose a card that represents their opinion. They do not reveal their choice to others yet.
Tip — Encourage participants to briefly note why they chose that value, as this will facilitate discussion later.
- 5
Revelation and Discussion
20 minAll participants reveal their cards simultaneously. The facilitator then guides a discussion on the perception gaps, asking each person to explain their choice. The goal is to understand the reasons for the divergences and to seek common ground.
Tip — Be attentive to ensure everyone has the opportunity to speak, especially those whose opinions diverge the most.
- 6
Summary and Conclusion
15 minThe facilitator summarises the key points of the discussion and identifies common and divergent perceptions. They encourage the group to think about concrete actions to align their perceptions or to leverage the divergences.
Tip — Use a whiteboard to visualise points of convergence and divergence, as this will help clarify discussions.
Variants
- Use cards with words (for example, 'strongly agree', 'neutral', 'disagree') instead of numbers.
- Adapt the game to assess project risks using coloured cards representing different levels of risk.
- Integrate a brainstorming phase after the discussion to generate ideas on how to resolve divergences.
Debrief guide
- What did you learn about your colleagues' perceptions?
- How did the divergences in perception influence the discussion?
- What was the biggest surprise during the evaluation?
- How can you use these learnings in your daily work?
- What concrete actions can you implement to better manage divergences in the future?