The Devil's Advocate

The Devil's Advocate is a game that helps teams explore difficult choices by confronting divergent opinions. Participants are invited to defend the position they prefer the least, which fosters critical reflection and empathy. This exercise allows for a better understanding of others' perspectives and strengthens team cohesion.

Walkthrough

1. 1

   Introduction

   10 min

   The facilitator explains the purpose of the game: to explore difficult decisions by adopting opposing perspectives. They clarify that each participant will have to defend an option they do not like. This helps develop empathy and understanding of different viewpoints. The facilitator addresses any questions from the participants.

   Tip — Use a simple example to illustrate the concept before starting with the main topic.

2. 2

   Choosing the Topic

   10 min

   The facilitator proposes several difficult decision topics, and the team chooses the one that concerns them the most. The topics can be related to an ongoing project or a strategic choice for the team. It is important that the topic is relevant to all participants to ensure their engagement in the exercise.

   Tip — Prepare a few potential topics in advance to save time and stay relevant.

3. 3

   Role Distribution

   5 min

   The facilitator divides the group into two sub-groups. Each sub-group will have to defend one of the options from the difficult choice. Participants are encouraged to put themselves in the shoes of those who genuinely support that option. This helps develop their ability to argue and understand others' motivations.

   Tip — Ensure that the groups are balanced in terms of numbers and diversity of opinions.

4. 4

   Argument Preparation

   15 min

   Each sub-group has time to prepare their arguments in favour of the option they are defending. They should think about the advantages, benefits, and reasons why this option might be the best. The facilitator moves from group to group to offer help and suggestions if necessary.

   Tip — Encourage participants to think of arguments they may not have naturally considered.

5. 5

   Debate

   20 min

   The sub-groups present their arguments in turn. Each group has a limited time to present their points, followed by a question-and-answer period where the other group can challenge the arguments presented. The facilitator ensures that the debate remains respectful and constructive.

   Tip — Set a specific time for each intervention to maintain pace and engagement.

6. 6

   Conclusion

   10 min

   The facilitator concludes the debate and invites participants to reflect on what they have learned. They highlight the importance of understanding divergent perspectives and how this can enrich collective decision-making. Participants share their impressions of the exercise.

   Tip — Encourage participants to express what they felt while defending an opinion they do not share.

Variants

• Use this game to explore personal choices rather than professional ones.
• Adapt the exercise for decisions with multiple options by adding more sub-groups.
• Incorporate a neutral observer who will provide feedback on the dynamics of the debate.